AOFM invests $3.4bn in RMBS

By Andrea Lavigne | 29/01/2010 8:26:00 AM | 0 comments

The Australian Office of Financial Management announced yesterday it will invest up to $3.4bn in RMBS to five issuers.

The investment is part of the government's $8bn extension to the AOFM's RMBS program last year, which doubled its original investment made in 2008.

The recipients of the investment include Resimac, Liberty Financial, Members Equity Bank, Firstmac and AMP Bank. They will receive "pipeline" funding, which means each issuer will have AOFM support for RMBS issuances until 15 Dec.

It is understood that the latest investment will be slightly different from last year, in that the participation of the AOFM will be reduced as outside investor participation is expected to pick up in 2010.

"The announcement provides more funding security for these smaller lenders and will allow them to keep lending," said Treasurer Wayne Swan. "This will place more competition on the big banks, helping to put downward pressure on mortgage rates over time."

Swan's announcement precedes the RBA's decision on rates, scheduled to be announced next week.

Related stories:

AMP RMBS doubles in pricing - The first Australian RMBS of 2010 received strong investor interest, pricing at $1bn - almost twice the expected $543.5m.

Big Four set sights on RMBS market - The return of the majors to the local securitisation markets will provide a boost as it continues to recover from the effects of the GFC.

 

 

Latest Comments

Latest TV

Game plan: Which footy teams are lenders betting on? play

Game plan: Which footy teams are lenders betting on?
Footy season is here and mortgage industry ...

Latest news

AB issue 9.09

E-Mag

AB issue 9.09 OUT NOW
New ‘unfair’ liability as NCCP enhanced; MFAA closely watching commissions; Adva ...

view online

Your comment

Australian Broker forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.
Name

Comment


By submitting, I agree to the Terms & Conditions

You are about to submit your comment. Please ensure it is:

  • Professional
  • In your own name or pseudonym, not impersonating someone else
  • Free from offensive language
  • Free from advertising
  • Please also see our Terms & Conditions

If you prefer not to post but want to get your viewpoint across, you can always email the editor.