Foreclosures to dramatically increase

by Caroline Dann21 Sep 2012

Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) is claiming a fifth of first home owners risk losing their properties in the next few months.

Its Australian Mortgage Stress Analysis of 26,000 households claims 16% currently fall into the ‘severe mortgage stress’ category, which is defined as falling behind in payments, or receiving threats of foreclosure.
Low-to mid-income households were among the hardest hit. 
The number of suburban homes in this demographic will rise by 4,000 before June 30 2013, according to the report.
Speaking to Australian Broker Online, Paramatta broker Kim Narayan, who works in one of the worst-hit regions for mortgage stress and arrears, confirmed many locals were moving further west as it had become too expensive.
“A lot of people struggle with affordability here, and since valuation has gone down it’s made it even harder,” she said.
The report hinted that a significant proportion of those facing severe stress were recipients of low doc loans, pre-2008.
"Most people don't realise that the average loan size is twice as big as it was in 2005 so many people are still mortgaged to the hilt,'' DFA director Martin North said.
Both Ms Narayan and broker Ben Eick of Nelson Bay, another badly-hit region, agreed 100% loans or low-doc loans could be a factor.
“We had a bit of a pre-GFC boom in 2005 and 2006, and people thought ‘this is good value for money and these places will keep appreciating’ and of course what they’ve done since then is depreciate. And that’s where they’ve come unstuck,” said Mr Eick.
“I think the reason arrears are generally high here is due to people wanting to take advantage of 100% lends a couple of years ago, and the high first home owner grant concessions at the time,” agreed Narayan.
Eick offered a stark warning for brokers in the face of increased arrears and foreclosures.
“Obviously you don’t get paid trail if a mortgage is in arrears, which is a big problem for brokers,” he said.
Related news:


  • by Philthyo 21/09/2012 9:15:01 AM

    The downturn in valuations is not the problem - the house could be worth zero but that's not a problem as long as the borrower maintains payments - lack of financial verification (eg low doc/no doc) loans are the cause.

  • by Overtheborderbroker 21/09/2012 9:59:08 AM

    Lenders have learned nothing. There are still lenders today who will gladly write a 90% LVR loan with 10% borrowed deposit and brokers lining up to find clients for them. More catastrophe just waiting to happen. In 1975 the average home loan was 24% of the average wage. Today it's 50%. Any broker writing a 90% loan with borrowed deposit is adding to mortgage stress and and could be liable under NCCP if the deal falls apart down the track.

  • by paul 21/09/2012 10:04:23 AM

    i do not think high lvr loans are to blame in essence. the issue is that a few of the larger lenders thought they could do high lvr loans but did not increase the level of paperwork required for assessment and treated them as 80% loans when assessing. A big issue is also the unsecured debt that people have and the ease in the past of obtaining them. I understand it will be hard for people to roll that debt into the home loan now due to price stagnation or even decreases but when stating the 100% or high lvr loans are to blame can the whole picture be looked at not just one aspect. We also need to stop using our homes as a giant credit card.