First home buyers not a solution

by Rebecca Pike29 Sep 2018

Researchers are warning that the rise in first home buyers is not a solution to falling home owners and more should be done.

According to the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, there has been a rise in the number of renters, particularly in the younger age groups.

The HILDA survey shows that between 2001-2004 and 2013-2016, home ownership fell overall by -3.7% but there was a larger drop of -5.9% for the age group 18-24 and -5.2% for 35-44s.

RiskWise Property Research CEO Doron Peleg said while this could reflect that young people were staying in the parental home longer, it could also mean that they simply could not afford to purchase in such an unaffordable market.

He said, “In NSW investors are the minority as investor lending has been falling since mid-2017 due to credit restrictions and uncertainty over the outcome of the banking Royal Commission.

“The good news is where we see there is lower investor activity, we see house price decline and therefore more first home buyers are able to enter the market.”

First home buyers now make up around 18.1% of the market, an increase from 13.2% in July 2016.

However, Peleg said that in the medium and long-term, chronic undersupply of family suitable housing is likely to push prices up and therefore out of reach of first home buyers.

Peleg added, “This is high on the agenda for the Federal Government, however, a co-ordinated strategy should be put in place to encourage a better spread of the population across Australia as well as the construction of owner-occupier appropriate dwellings in the middle-ring suburbs in our major capital cities.

“Without a strategic and comprehensive solution, it is likely that the current supply and demand patterns will once again lead to escalating prices, deteriorating housing affordability and a reduction in home ownership in Australia.

“We advocate increasing density in middle-ring and outlying areas of the cities, provided there are adequate transport solutions, re-zoning in key transport corridors and train lines, to access employment.

“While development in middle-ring suburbs has increased in recent years, especially in Sydney, today’s record levels of housing construction are the bare minimum needed to meet the elevated level of population growth in the two major capital cities.”

He said other measures should be undertaken at the state level, particularly in relation to planning, greenfield land releases, rezoning and a more co-ordinated approach between the states and the local governments in relation to those matters.

In addition, he said federal to state governments and state to local governments should provide incentives for meeting pre-approved development targets and increasing dwelling supply.

Peleg said measures should also be implemented to accelerate the planning and approval processes and to incentivise local governments that development meets pre-agreed targets in relation to dwelling supply.

He said allocation of significant funding to infrastructure upgrades in many urban and regional areas in the 2018 Federal Budget would have a positive impact on dwelling supply.

“Governments should also be encouraged to increase land supply release and development through co-ordinated strategy and targets,” he added.

“While land supply in Sydney and to a lesser extent Melbourne is limited in the inner and middle-rings, there is a certain level of supply in surrounding suburbs. Much of this greenfield development in Melbourne is less than 30 kilometres from the CBD; in Sydney it tends to be more than 40 kilometres from the CBD.

“Land releases in the outer suburbs are essential, particularly in Sydney to support the other supply-related measures that have been detailed above. The outer suburbs are significantly more affordable, and they provide an opportunity to first home buyers to enter the property market.”