Mortgage brokers who generate strong income and build sizeable trail books may still be heading toward a shortfall when they eventually step back from their businesses, a new industry perspective warns.
For first-home buyers and property investors, brokers are central to long-term planning. Yet many brokers fail to apply the same discipline to their own financial futures and borrowing capacity.
Recludo co-founder and certified exit planning advisor Ash Playsted (pictured) says a recurring pattern emerges when he works with brokerage owners on succession and enterprise value. The biggest risk, Playsted argues, is “the wealth gap quietly forming between the life they want next and the capital their business will ultimately deliver.”
Playsted notes that many founders assume a profitable, growing brokerage will automatically fund the lifestyle they want after exit. A simple capital requirement exercise can quickly challenge that belief.
He points to the example of generating $250,000 a year in passive income at a conservative 4% return, which implies a capital base of around $6.25 million and potentially closer to $8 million once tax and volatility are included.
Against that benchmark, many brokers find their current assets – from personally reliant trail books to underutilised property holdings and modest superannuation balances – fall short.
Most mortgage broking businesses in Australia are founder-led. This model produces strong client relationships and entrepreneurial drive, but it also creates risk.
That concentration of value in founder-led firms comes as brokers play an increasingly dominant role in home lending. The MFAA’s latest Quarterly Market Share report shows brokers wrote 76.7% of new residential home loans in the December quarter, totalling $142.20 billion – a record December share since the series began in 2013.
Because the business depends so heavily on the founder, its valuation becomes closely tied to that person’s ongoing involvement. Playsted argues that many brokerages are built to generate cash flow rather than enterprise value, with systems, leadership structures, and client ownership models not always designed for transferability.
Succession planning is often pushed back until founders start thinking about retirement, by which time the window to reshape the business may be narrowing.
A persistent misconception, Playsted says, is the assumption that strong income automatically equals wealth.
A brokerage generating $400,000 or $600,000 a year can feel highly successful from a lifestyle perspective, but “income tied to the founder’s effort stops when that effort stops.” Wealth, by contrast, is the capital that continues to produce income regardless of whether the founder remains involved.
One of the most important shifts founders can make is moving from a growth mindset to a value acceleration mindset.
“Growth asks a simple question: how do we produce more revenue?” Playsted writes. “Value acceleration asks a more important one: how do we build an enterprise that continues to create value even if the founder’s involvement changes?”
For brokers, that means prioritising leadership depth, recurring revenue quality, operational systems, and clear succession pathways much earlier in the journey – and regularly testing whether the capital their business could release would truly fund the life they want next.
Get the hottest and freshest property and mortgage news delivered right into your inbox. Subscribe now to our FREE daily newsletter.
